09/10/2010 (3:58 pm)

Reports: HP’s Hurd may land at Oracle

Filed under: finance |

Former Hewlett-Packard Co. CEO Mark Hurd is in talks with Oracle Corp. about taking a high-level executive position, it was widely reported Sunday. Hurd resigned last month under pressure, amid allegations of sexual harassment and falsified expenses. Oracle CEO Larry Ellison has been among his strongest supporters, saying in an earlier email to the newspaper that Hurd’s ouster “was the worst personnel decision since the idiots on the Apple board fired Steve Jobs many years ago.”

Source

07/24/2010 (2:56 pm)

PDX traffic declines

Filed under: finance |

Commercial air traffic at Portland International Airport dipped .4 percent in June to 1.2 million over the same period a year earlier. For the year, traffic is off 2.7 percent.

International traffic is posting the biggest declines. The number of international passengers moving through PDX was down 5.7 percent in June and is off 19.1 percent for the year. Much of that can be attributed to Deutsche Lufthansa AG’s decision to ground its six-year-old Portland-to-Frankfurt nonstop service last September. Domestic traffic was down just .4 percent for June and is off 2.1 percent year-to-date.

Of PDX’s big three, only Alaska Airlines saw increased traffic from a year ago, with 179,280 passengers in June compared to 151,175 last year no faxing payday loan. Seattle-based Horizon Air, PDX’s busiest carrier, reported a 6.6 percent decline in year-over-year monthly traffic, while traffic on Southwest Airlines of Dallas dropped 4.1 percent.

Freight moved by PDX carriers was up 5 percent from a year ago to 16,204 in June, though for the year to date the number dropped 6.1 percent to 204,485.

Nationally, U.S. carriers are faring well. The Air Transport Association of America reports that passenger revenue was up 25 percent in June over a year earlier, the sixth consecutive month of revenue growth.

Source

06/07/2010 (2:29 pm)

St. Louis, KC epilepsy foundations to merge

Filed under: finance |

The Epilepsy Foundation of the St. Louis Region is merging with the Epilepsy Foundation of Kansas and Western Missouri, which is based in Kansas City, Mo.

Both are affiliates of the national Epilepsy Foundation, which approved the merger.

The newly merged entity, named the Epilepsy Foundation of Missouri and Kansas, will have an administrative office in St. Louis and an office in Kansas City, with intention to expand into Kansas within the next two years, according to Darla Templeton.

Templeton, who was president and CEO of the St. Louis chapter, will take those roles in the new merged group.

Because of the economy, donations and funding are down, she said. “We thought if we merged, we could streamline and be more efficient and effective with just one executive director or CEO for both,” Templeton said.

She said the board of the Kansas City-based group had gone through a series of executive directors, and “from their perspective, without a very positive results.”

The Kansas City group has been without an executive director since April 2009.

In April, the Epilepsy Foundation of Kansas and Western Missouri sued its former executive director, Sean Taylor, claiming he diverted about $80,000 of foundation funds for his own use, according to the suit. Seema Chawla, an associate with Bryan Cave in Kansas City representing the foundation, confirmed Friday that the suit is pending.

David Gitt, formerly on the board of the St. Louis chapter, will chair the new, merged board, which will number 16.

The operating budget for the combined chapters is about $700,000, Templeton said.

The St. Louis affiliate is accredited by Commission for Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities and holds the seal of the Better Business Bureau, the group said. Both organizations are members of United Way.

Source

05/29/2010 (2:36 am)

Salpare Bay developers plan to file for bankruptcy

Filed under: finance |

The developers of Salpare Bay, the failed luxury condominium project on Hayden Island, expect to file for bankruptcy by June 4.

The bankruptcy plan, disclosed in a federal lawsuit against the lenders on the $100 million project, would occur in time to stop a sheriff’s auction of the property to satisfy a $4.4 million judgment won by builder J.E. Dunn Northwest Inc. for its work on the project in 2007.

Attorney Christine Kosydar, who has represented majority owner Michael DeFrees and minority owner George Killian, revealed plans to file for bankruptcy on or before June 4 in papers disclosing a conflict between the pair. Kosydar sought court permission to withdraw as Killian’s legal counsel because of the dispute.

The document did not disclose whether the bankruptcy petition would be filed under Chapter 7 (liquidation) or Chapter 11 (reorganization) of the U.S. Bankruptcy code.

DeFrees and Killian are seeking $390 million from 40 lenders who brought the project to a halt when they declined to fund a $63.6 million loan.

A bankruptcy petition would add another legal wrinkle to a vast case that already has spawned what’s thought to be the largest legal negligence case ever filed in Oregon. The 40 lenders have sued law firm Sussman Shank LLP in Multnomah County Circuit Court for $447 million, saying its counsel led them to decline to fund the loan and exposed them to liability to DeFrees and Killian.

Sussman Shank counters that it represented the one bank that is not part of the case.

The Multnomah County Sheriff’s Department auction, which covers both the condominium property and associated marina, is currently scheduled for 10 a.m. June 4 on the courthouse steps.

Also pending on the Salpare Bay calendar: U.S. District Court Judge Michael Hogan has scheduled a mediation session in the developer-lender cases for 9 a.m. June 2 in his chambers.

Salpare Bay, 449 N.E. Tomahawk Island Drive, offered buyers the chance to live next to the Columbia River in luxurious condominiums and first-class marina accommodations. The 204-unit project has languished since mid-2007.

Source

03/23/2010 (2:28 pm)

Greenspan offers a mixed mea culpa

Filed under: finance |

Alan Greenspan acknowledged Thursday that U.S. regulators had failed to grasp the magnitude of the financial crisis, but the former Federal Reserve chairman argued that low interest rates were not to blame for inflating the housing bubble.

In a paper he is due to deliver at the Brookings Institution on Friday, Greenspan, who was Fed chairman from 1987 to 2006, examines the factors that caused the global financial crisis and plunged the U.S. economy into one of the worst recessions on record.

Greenspan said the relatively minimal fallout from the bursting of the dot.com bubble in 2000 led regulators to believe that future asset bubbles would pose a limited risk to the economy.

He also blamed financial firms for relying too heavily on the recomendations of ratings agencies and their own risk management offices during the boom years, when investment banks leveraged billions of dollars worth of assets, including mortgage backed securities, that later proved to be worthless.

"In the growing state of high euphoria, risk managers, the Federal Reserve, and other regulators failed to fully comprehend the underlying size, length, and impact of the negative tail of the distribution of risk outcomes," Greenspan wrote.

"For decades, with little to no data, most analysts, in my experience, had conjectured a far more limited tail risk," he continued. "This is arguably the major source of the critical risk management system failures."

But the former Fed chief was clear that the low interest rate policy the central bank maintained during his tenure did not inflate the housing bubble that ultimately precipitated the crisis, as many critics have argued.

"To my knowledge, that lowering of the federal funds rate nearly a decade ago was not considered a key factor in the housing bubble," he said. "The global house price bubble was a consequence of lower interest rates, but it was long term interest rates that galvanized home asset prices, not the overnight rates of central banks."

To explain the decline in long-term interest rates, Greenspan argues that the explosive growth of developing economies, particularly in Asia, in the aftermath of the Cold War led to global imbalances and a surplus of liquidity instant payday loan.

Despite his admission that regulators failed to adequately comprehend the crisis, Greenspan offered a word of caution when it comes to imposing new regulations aimed at preventing future crises.

"Inhibiting irrational behavior when it can be identified, through regulation, as recent history has demonstrated, could be stabilizing," he said. "But, there is an inevitable cost of regulation in terms of economic growth and standards of living when it imposes restraints beyond containing unproductive behavior."

The most important reforms that regulators could make, according to Greenspan, would be to limit the amount of risk financial institutions are allowed to take and increase banks’ capital requirements.

Greenspan also pointed to the risks posed by large, interconnected financial institutions to the overall economy. AIG, the giant insurance company, is perhaps the most famous of these "too-big-to-fail" institutions to have been bailed out by regulators because the company’s collapse could have caused major damage to an already fragile economy.

However, the Maestro, as Greenspan is known, had this to say about the too big to fail problem: "Systemically threatening institutions is among the major regulatory problems for which there are no good solutions."

"The notion that risks can be identified in a sufficiently timely manner to enable the liquidation of a large failing bank with minimum loss, has proved untenable during this crisis and I suspect in future crises as well," he said.

Still, Greenspan said banks with the potential to become too big to fail should be required to issue bonds that could be converted into equity stakes if capital levels fall below a certain threshold.

But if that fails to reign in excessive growth, "we should allow large institutions to fail," he said. If regulators determine that an institution is to big to liquidate quickly, it should be taken in to "a special bankruptcy facility" where it will be broken into smaller entities, Greenspan said.  

Source

03/09/2010 (3:27 pm)

Starbucks in crosshairs on gun-control debate

Filed under: finance |

The debate over gun control is heating up at Starbucks.

Gun owners bearing arms have been gathering at various Starbucks locations in states where it’s legal to do so in public. That’s sparked protests from gun-control advocates and kudos from pro-gun groups.

The coffee chain says that its stores simply abide by state laws, and it is legal to carry weapons in 43 states. But businesses have the right to prohibit customers from carrying guns in their establishments despite state laws, and that’s the crux of this particular dust-up.

"While we deeply respect the views of all of our customers, Starbucks’ long-standing approach to this issue remains unchanged," the company said in a statement. "We comply with local laws and statutes in all the communities we serve."

Starbucks (SBUX, Fortune 500) said the gun-toting gatherings first began at its stores in Northern California after two other chains, San Francisco-based Peet’s Coffee & Tea and California Pizza Kitchen, put policies in place to prevent gun owners from carrying firearms in their stores.

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence then wrote a letter to Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, urging Starbucks to enforce a similar policy. On its Web site, the Brady Campaign is soliciting supporters through an online petition that urges Starbucks to offer "espresso shots, not gunshots" and reverse its corporate policy.

On the other side of the debate, gun rights advocates are pleased with Starbucks’ decision. Forum members of OpenCarry.org, a pro-gun Internet community with nearly 28,000 members, are posting that they are "impressed" with Starbucks’ stance and will regularly buy the company’s coffee to show support.

Starbucks said if it were to adopt a policy prohibiting customers from carrying guns in states where it is legal to bear firearms, that would require its employees to ask law abiding customers to leave stores, putting them in an unfair and potentially unsafe position.

The company also said the gun-control debate belongs in the legislatures and courts, not at its stores.

"Advocacy groups from both sides of this issue have chosen to use Starbucks as a way to draw attention to their positions," the company said. "As the public debate continues, we are asking all interested parties to refrain from putting Starbucks or our partners in the middle of this divisive issue."  

Source

12/25/2009 (12:47 am)

Saab may get a second life

Filed under: finance |

Don’t close the coffin on Saab just yet.

Spyker, a Dutch maker of exotic cars, said Sunday that it had made a new offer to General Motors for the Swedish car brand.

GM announced on Friday that it would let the brand die after it had failed to reach a deal with potential buyers, including Spyker and Swedish carmaker Koenigsegg.

Early Sunday, Spyker Chief Executive Victor Muller said the company had submitted a proposal that addresses the issues that had hung up a deal.

"Despite our collective 11th-hour set-back, we are returning to the table with a renewed offer, that addresses every known issue brought to light during the initial negotiations and that has the full backing of the Saab management," Muller said in a statement.

"Our efforts are based on our passion for saving an iconic brand that we would be honored to shepherd, and the jobs and livelihoods of thousands of loyal Saab employees, suppliers and dealers around the world," he added.

Some 3,400 employees globally would be directly affected by Saab’s closure, according to GM spokesman Chris Pruess.

In a statement on Sunday, GM said it had "received inquires from several parties" following Friday’s announcement. The company added that it would "evaluate each inquiry."

Spyker’s offer is set to expire Monday at 5 p.m. ET.

Saab has never been a big-selling car brand, but the recent global recession and news of the brand’s possible demise have driven sales down to crisis levels. Saab’s U.S. sales have fallen by more than half so far this year.

Sweden’s other major automaker, Volvo, is currently owned by Ford (F, Fortune 500), which is in the process of selling it to the Chinese automaker Geely.

What went wrong

GM previously said that the potential deals with both Spyker and Koenigsegg fell through because of unspecified issues that arose during negotiations.

As of Friday, GM was still planning to sell some Saab 9-3 and 9-5 technologies to the Chinese automaker Beijing Automotive Industry Holdings Co. Ltd. That deal was announced last week.

GM has owned a major stake in the Swedish automaker since 1989 and took full ownership in 2000; Saab has been making cars since 1949. GM will now begin winding down Saab production, but warranties will continue to be honored, and spare parts will still be available, the company said.

In the past two decades, GM has made every effort to turn Saab into a profitable car brand, Smith said. But recent global economic problems were simply too much for the still-weak automaker to survive.

As part of its government-sponsored bankruptcy restructuring, GM planned to sell of or wind down four of the eight brands it recently operated.

Pontiac is being wound down; a deal to sell the Saturn brand to Penske Automotive fell through in September; and a deal to sell the Hummer SUV brand to Chinese heavy equipment maker Sichuan Tengzhong is awaiting government approvals.

GM’s remaining brands are Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac. 

Source

12/19/2009 (9:42 pm)

Calls to drop Medicare change intensify

Filed under: finance |

Senate Democrats are preparing to drop a compromise health-care plan that would allow 55- to 64-year-olds to buy into Medicare because of opposition from Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman, two senior Democratic sources said Monday.

"It’s what the White House wants, and there aren’t many other options that allow us to finish by Christmas," said one source.

Lieberman, an independent who caucuses with the Democrats, has emerged as the majority party’s main obstacle to its efforts to get a health care bill through the Senate before Christmas. He ratcheted up his public opposition to the bill Sunday by threatening to join a Republican filibuster if the legislation contains either a government-run public health insurance option or a proposed alternative that would expand Medicare to people as young as 55.

"I think the danger always is you try to add too much onto a bill," he told reporters Monday evening. He said he supports the "core" of the bill, including tighter regulations on private insurers — but he wants Democrats to "take off some of this stuff that runs the risk of creating federal debt, and moves toward a government takeover of insurance, which I think would be bad."

Unanimous Republican opposition so far means Senate Democrats need all 60 votes in their caucus to close debate on the sweeping health care bill. Final passage of the bill would then require only a simple majority of 51.

Lieberman supported letting older workers buy into Medicare in 2000, when he was the Democratic vice presidential candidate, and as recently as September in comments to a Connecticut newspaper.

But he said Monday that the idea was "no longer necessary," since the Senate bill includes subsidies to help people over 55 and older buy insurance coverage before they become eligible for Medicare.

"I was suggesting various ideas for health care reform that did not involve the public option, and that was the focus at that time," he said. "But the important thing is I’m for health care reform, and if we get together, we’re going to deliver a health care reform bill that will provide the ability to get health insurance to 30 million people that don’t have it now."

And Lieberman spokesman Marshall Wittmann said that now, "We have a huge national deficit and a program that analysts indicate is in dire fiscal straits in 2009."

Emergency meeting Senate Democrats held an emergency meeting Monday night to discuss the issue, which threatens to derail the Obama administration’s push for a sweeping reform of U.S. health insurance. Although a final decision was not made at Monday night’s meeting, a second Democratic source said a final decision could be made at a White House meeting Tuesday between the Senate’s Democratic majority and President Barack Obama.

"I think there is a fundamental understanding of the direction we’re going in," said Sen. John Kerry, D-Massachusetts. Before the meeting, liberal Democrats Tom Harkin of Iowa and Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia indicated that the Medicare buy-in would likely be dropped.

While they didn’t like the idea, they suggested they would support a health care bill anyway payday loan lenders. Democrats "may have to do what Mr. Lieberman wants," Harkin told CNN. The Medicare expansion was part of a package of provisions announced by Reid last week as an alternative to a government-run public health insurance program, which lacked enough support among Democrats to break a filibuster.

Negotiated by a team of 10 Democratic senators — five liberal and five moderate — the compromise package was hailed by Reid, Obama and others as an important step forward in the health care debate. The package also would allow private insurers to offer non-profit health coverage overseen by the government.

Many senators have reserved judgment on the compromise proposal until the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) provides its analysis of how much it costs. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would discuss no specifics of a bill after Monday night’s caucus, telling reporters he would wait until the CBO finished its estimate of a revised bill’s price tag.

But he said the measure "saves lives, saves money, and saves Medicare." "I am confident that by next week we’ll be on our way to forward this bill to the president," he said.

Backing public option Most Democrats support the public option as a non-profit competitor to private insurers that would expand coverage and bring down prices. Republicans and some moderate Democrats, along with the health insurance industry — one of the major employers in Lieberman’s home state — oppose a public option, calling it a first step toward a government takeover of the U.S. health care system.

Lieberman first expressed possible opposition to the health care bill in late October, saying he would join a GOP filibuster if the measure contained the public option. Asked about Lieberman’s position then, Reid said: "Joe Lieberman is the least of Harry Reid’s problems."

Another potential obstacle for Reid is moderate Democrat Ben Nelson of Nebraska, who said Sunday said he cannot support the Senate bill without tighter restrictions on federal funding for abortion. The Senate last week defeated an amendment proposed by Nelson and two other senators that would adopt tougher language on abortion funding contained in the House health care bill.

A compromise on the abortion language is possible, said Nelson, one of 10 Senate Democrats who negotiated in private last week on the public option compromise.

If the Senate eventually passes a health care bill, its version will have to be merged with the version the House of Representatives passed in November, which includes a public health insurance plan.

The final bill would then need approval from both chambers before going to Obama to be signed into law. Obama and Democratic leaders have said they want the bill completed this year. The Senate would need to finish its work this week to leave a realistic chance of meeting that schedule.

–CNN’s Dana Bash, Ted Barrett and Tom Cohen contributed to this report.  

Source

12/12/2009 (5:32 pm)

Sales tax revenue drops across DFW

Filed under: finance |

Sales tax revenue continues to fall in Dallas and other cities across North Texas.

Dallas' sales tax revenue fell 5.3 percent for November, compared to collections for the same period in 2008. Still, it's better than the Texas average, which dropped 14.4 percent, according to state Comptroller Susan Combs.

Dallas' net payment was $14.5 million, compared to $15.4 million for the same period last year. So far this year, payments are down 9.2 percent, dropping to $205.4 million from $227 million in 2008.

Fort Worth saw its monthly payment drop a whopping 17.3 percent, to $7 million from $8.5 million a year ago. For the year, payments in Fort Worth are down 7.9 percent, to $97.8 million from $106 no fax payday loan.2 million.

Frisco saw its November collections drop 11.6 percent, Plano saw a drop of 19.1 percent, Grapevine tax revenue for the month was down 8.3 percent and Irving showed a decrease of 18 percent. Lewisville fared better than most North Texas cities, with November 2009 collections dipping less than 1 percent when compared with November 2008.

Texas collected $1.7 billion in sales taxes last month, making November the ninth consecutive month of a year-over-year decline.Combs says collections are down in all categories, including retailing, oil and gas production and construction.

Source

12/06/2009 (11:24 am)

CAW to ‘reaffiliate’ with the Ontario Federation of Labour

Filed under: finance |

The Canadian Auto Workers says it will reaffiliate with the Ontario Federation of Labour after an absence of more than a decade.

CAW president Ken Lewenza said Friday that the union is currently talking to OFL leaders about conditions for a return that will likely come in the first quarter of next year.

"We’re not reaffiliating just to reaffiliate," Lewenza told more than 800 delegates at a CAW council meeting earlier. "We’re affiliating because we believe the labour movement needs us and we need the labour movement."

Union delegates had passed a resolution at a council meeting earlier this year to start a "constructive and respectful" dialogue that could lead to possible reaffiliation.

The CAW, one of the province’s biggest private sector unions, left the federation in 1997 after it could not get assurances of representation among the OFL’s top four officers payday loan online.

It has about 225,000 workers across the country including a majority in Ontario.

Lewenza said the labour movement in the province needs a united front in the growing attack on workers by corporations and governments.

The umbrella federation represents about 700,000 workers in scores of unions.

The split between the federation and the CAW has weakened the labour movement during the last decade as the groups pursued different strategies and agendas with less collective power, according to some labour analysts.

Source

« Previous PageNext Page »