Finance & Business World

The Canadian company trying to build the disputed Keystone XL pipeline in the U.S. submitted a new application for the project Friday after changing the route to avoid environmentally sensitive land in Nebraska.

TransCanada said it applied again to the State Department for permission to build the pipeline to carry oil from so-called tar sands in western Canada to a company hub in Steele City, Neb. From there, the project would link up with other pipelines operated by the company to carry oil to refineries on the Texas Gulf Coast.

President Barack Obama blocked the pipeline earlier this year, citing uncertainty over the Nebraska route - a decision that drew fire from Republicans and industry groups.

TransCanada had proposed a new route last month that would veer east around the groundwater-rich Sandhills region before looping back to the original route.

State Department approval is needed because the $7 billion pipeline would cross a U.S. border. The department confirmed Friday the application for the new route had been received.

The pipeline filing came on the same day as a disappointing report on U.S. job growth. The Labor Department said employers pulled back on hiring in April for the second straight month, evidence of an economy still growing only sluggishly, though the overall jobless rate slipped to 8.1 percent as more people gave up looking for work.

Obama is under pressure to support the pipeline from Republicans and business and labor leaders who argue it would create jobs; the State Department estimates it could result in up to 6,000 new jobs.

“The multi-billion dollar Keystone XL pipeline project will reduce the United States’ dependence on foreign oil and support job growth by putting thousands of Americans to work,” said Russ Girling, TransCanada’s president and chief executive officer. “Keystone XL will transport U.S. crude oil from the very large Bakken supply basin in Montana and North Dakota, along with Canadian oil, to U.S. refineries.”

The pipeline’s opponents, including Democrats and environmental groups, say it would transport “dirty oil” from tar sands in Alberta, Canada, that would require huge amounts of energy to extract. They also worry about a possible spill. The pipeline would travel through Montana, South Dakota, Kansas and Oklahoma, in addition to Nebraska.

In blocking the pipeline in January, Obama said there was not enough time for a fair review before a looming deadline forced on him by congressional Republicans. The action did not kill the project but put off a tough choice on the once-obscure pipeline, which has become a flashpoint in the bitter partisan political fight over jobs and the environment and a focus of the presidential campaign between Obama his likely Republican opponent, Mitt Romney. Romney has called on Obama to approve the pipeline.

Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman signed a bill last month that allows the state to proceed with its review of the proposed pipeline through his state, regardless of what happens at the federal level.

A senior State Department official said U.S. officials would conduct a thorough review of the new application, with a final decision not expected until early next year _ well after the presidential election.

Officials will use previous studies to the extent possible, the official said, but will need to complete a new environmental assessment, especially since the route has changed since TransCanada first applied for the pipeline in 2008.

The State Department review is likely to include hiring an outside consultant, a point of contention in the original review conducted by the agency. Democratic lawmakers complained that the firm that conducted the review, Cardno Entrix, had a conflict of interest because of previous work with TransCanada.

The department’s acting inspector general found no conflict of interest or improper political influence but said the State Department could have done a better job of evaluating some concerns about the project and should improve its oversight of contractors.

Jane Kleeb, executive director of Bold Nebraska, a group that opposes the pipeline, said the new route still goes through an aquifer that serves eight states and should not be approved.

“The fundamental facts remain: Americans are being asked to put clean water at risk for an extreme form of energy that will add nothing to our energy security,” Kleeb said.

But Girling, the TransCanada CEO, said the company’s proposal builds on more than three years of environmental review already conducted for Keystone XL, “the most comprehensive process ever for a cross-border pipeline.”

The earlier work should allow the new proposal to be processed “expeditiously,” Girling said, with a federal decision made after a final route through Nebraska is approved by state officials.

TransCanada expects to begin construction of the pipeline next year.

Source

Charles Wyplosz is betting Greece isn

Euro-area finance ministers are set to clear a second rescue for Greece today to avoid what Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti described as a potential

White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew said hundreds of billions of dollars in spending for roads and bridges, education and manufacturing are necessary to keep the U.S. economy growing.

President Barack Obama announced a package of proposals designed to jolt the housing market, his latest effort to reignite the economy after four years of foreclosures and falling home prices.

China is allowing the nation

OTTAWA

A former executive of KV Pharmaceutical Co. has accused the Bridgeton-based drug maker of cheating her out of stock options.

Melissa Hughes, the company’s former vice president of human resources, filed a lawsuit Oct. 28 in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. Her suit was transferred recently to federal court in St. Louis.

Hughes, who resides in St. Charles County, worked at KV from 2003 until 2010.

KV executives could not be reached for comment.

According to the lawsuit, KV awarded Hughes a stock option plan in February 2009, which granted her the right to purchase 40,000 shares of KV’s Class A common stock at $2.95 per share. Two months later, the suit alleges, KV gave her a “retention incentive” that granted her the right to purchase an additional 10,000 shares of Class A common stock at $1.52 per share.

The retention incentive, the suit alleges, was given “for the purpose of retaining her as a key employee with critical and confidential knowledge concerning the financial well-being of the company” because the loss of Hughes and other key workers would have resulted in an exodus of talented employees.

In exchange for continuing to work at KV, the suit alleges, Hughes continued to work at the drug maker “and diligently pursued their economic objectives, and did so at great peril to her long term financial well-being” as the company verged on bankruptcy during the period from April 2009 through September 2010 payday loan lenders.

KV officials acted in bad faith by failing to inform her that her stock options could not be exercised due to the company’s delays in filing its 2009 and 2010 annual reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the suit alleges. In addition, the suit alleges that KV officials repeatedly blocked Hughes’ attempts to exercise her stock options in 2010 and 2011.

According to the suit, KV’s former chief executive David Van Vliet told Hughes that her stock options “would be worth $2 million,” but the suit did not specify what period of time Vliet may have referenced. Vliet could not be reached Friday for comment.

Hughes claims that during the time period when she attempted to exercise her stock options from June 2010 to June 2011, the fair market value of KV stock was well above the option purchase price as set forth in her stock option agreements.

According to Bloomberg News, the average price of KV’s common shares during that time period was $3.17, with a low of 61 cents and a high of $13.07.

Hughes was notified last June that KV’s board of directors had canceled her stock options because they had expired before being exercised, the suit alleges.

Source

Property and casualty insurer Alleghany Corp. has agreed to buy the insurer Transatlantic Holdings Inc. in a cash-and-stock deal valued at about $3.4 billion.

The companies say the deal values Transatlantic at about $59.79 per share. That’s a 10 percent premium to the company’s $54.43 Friday closing stock price.

New York-based Transatlantic had been courted by several businesses, receiving takeover offers from Validus Holdings Ltd. and a unit of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., National Indemnity Corp. It also said in October that it had started confidential talks with an unnamed party.

In the deal with Alleghany, Transatlantic stockholders will receive 0.145 shares of Alleghany and $14.22 in cash for each share they own.

The companies say the deal announced Monday is expected to close early next year.

Source

U.S. workers increased their productivity this summer by the largest amount in a year and half, and they cost their employers less. The trend is good for corporate profits but not necessarily for job growth.

The Labor Department says productivity rose at an annual rate of 3.1 percent in the July-September quarter after two straight quarterly declines. Labor costs dropped at an annual rate of 2.4 percent in the third quarter, the first decline since late 2010 pay day loan lenders.

Productivity is the amount of output per hour of work. The big jump in productivity in the third quarter reflected the fact that economy had its best quarterly growth in a year while hours worked were little changed.

Source