03/13/2010 (8:24 am)

You knew it was coming: 3D TV

Filed under: term |

Want to be the first one on your block with a 3-D television? It will cost you about $3,000.

Samsung and Panasonic will start selling 3-D TVs in U.S. stores this week, inaugurating what manufacturers hope is the era of 3-D viewing in the living room. But because the sets require glasses, and there is for now little to watch in the enhanced format, it will take at least a few years for the technology to become mainstream, if it happens at all.

Samsung Electronics Co. announced Tuesday that for $3,000, buyers get a 46-inch set, two pairs of glasses and a 3-D Blu-ray player. Panasonic Corp. will start selling sets Wednesday.

The sales debut comes as moviegoers have shown considerable enthusiasm for the latest wave of 3-D titles in the theater totally free credit score.

Although it’s clear that 3-D sets for the home will appeal to technology and home-theater enthusiasts, it remains to be seen whether other consumers will be enticed to spend at least $500 above the price of a comparably sized standard TV and Blu-ray player.

TV makers hope so, because sets with the last big technological improvement — high definition — have come way down in price, below $500.

Source

Lending cash to individuals looking for cash advance or payday loans.

02/12/2010 (6:11 am)

Greenspan Sees ‘Slow’ Recovery, Is ‘Concerned’ If Stocks Drop

Filed under: economics |

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said a U.S. economic recovery is “going to be a slow, trudging thing,” and that he “would get very concerned” if stock prices continue to fall.

A drop in stock prices is “more than a warning sign,” Greenspan said yesterday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” program. “It’s important to remember that equity values, stock prices, are not just paper profits. They actually have a profoundly important impact on economic activity.”

U.S. stocks on Feb. 5 finished a fourth consecutive weekly decline, the longest such stretch since July. The Dow Jones Industrial Average through Feb. 5 had fallen 4 percent in 2010.

Unemployment likely will stay around 9 or 10 percent for most of this year, Greenspan said. “It’s very difficult to make the case that unemployment is coming down any time soon,” the former Fed chief said.

The U.S. has lost 8.4 million jobs since the recession, the deepest since the Great Depression of the 1930s, began more than two years ago. Unemployment topped 10 percent in October — the first time that’s happened in a quarter century — before retreating to 9.7 percent in January, according to Labor Department statistics.

Greenspan, who served as Fed chairman from 1987 until 2006, said the most useful step Congress could take to create jobs at this point would be to enact tax cuts for small businesses.

“They are the big creator of jobs,” he said. “But they won’t hire anybody if they don’t have any business.”

Economic Growth

Greenspan said the fourth-quarter’s economic growth rate was helped by inventory rebuilding, suggesting the U.S. economy “shot our ammunition” at the end of 2009. That means economic growth now “doesn’t have the strong momentum I hoped it would have,” Greenspan said.

The economy grew at a 5.7 percent annual rate during the last three months of 2009, the fastest pace in six years, according to Commerce Department data. That was the second quarterly increase in gross domestic product following four consecutive declines, the longest stretch of losses since records began in 1947.

In the residential property market, Greenspan said home prices are “bottoming out.” The housing market was the epicenter of the recession, and foreclosures are projected to set a record this year, according to private forecasts.

Regarding the federal budget deficit, which the Obama administration projects at more than $1 trillion for the second consecutive year, Greenspan said a tax increase will be needed and that the budget shortfall threatens the country’s standing in financial markets.

Tax Increase

“I have no doubt that we have to raise taxes in order to close this huge deficit, but we cannot do it wholly on the tax side, because that would significantly erode the rate of growth in the economy and the tax base, and the revenues that would be achieved would be far less” than one would expect, Greenspan said.

On Feb. 4, Congress approved increasing the federal debt limit by $1.9 trillion, to $14.3 trillion, enough to prevent lawmakers from having to raise it again before November’s midterm elections. The increase was more than twice the size of any of the four previous debt increases approved in the past two years.

Source

Apply for a payday loans today and as a first time customer, you can get up to $1000 directly to your account overnight.

02/06/2010 (2:30 pm)

Prime Minister Defends Spain’s Deficit to U.S. Business Leaders

Filed under: term |

Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero defended his country’s budget deficit and urged more U.S. investment in Spain during a meeting with U.S. business leaders, as investor concerns caused stocks to plummet in Spain.

Zapatero told a closed-door gathering at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington yesterday that Spain’s deficit was a consequence of stimulus spending that has peaked, and will be reduced through an aggressive austerity plan, according to an aide to the Spanish leader who briefed reporters and asked not to be identified.

Zapatero told the U.S. executives that his government will reduce spending by 50 billion euros ($68.7 billion) by 2013, the aide said. Spain, with a budget shortfall equivalent to 11.5 percent of gross domestic product, must bring its deficit down to 3 percent of GDP by 2013 to conform to European Union rules, the prime minister noted.

Spain’s benchmark IBEX 35 Index fell 5.9 percent yesterday day to 10,241.7, the steepest decline since Nov. 6, 2008. Stocks also fell in neighboring Portugal on concerns that the two nations will face difficulties like Greece has experienced in shrinking deficits.

Rating Agencies

Zapatero defended Spain’s debt as reasonable, according to the aide who attended the meeting. The prime minister said he was confident rating agencies would maintain a positive assessment of his economy.

Standard & Poor’s cut its rating on Spanish debt to AA+ from AAA in January 2009, and changed the nation’s outlook to “negative” from stable last December. S&P said Spain will experience a “more pronounced and persistent deterioration” in its budget and a “more prolonged period of economic weakness” than expected a year ago.

Speaking later yesterday to the Atlantic Council, a Washington-based public-policy group, Zapatero stressed that Spain’s debt-to-GDP ratio is 20 points lower than the average among EU countries.

Zapatero told U.S. executives in the private meeting that labor reforms would be announced today in Madrid that would reduce public spending, and said Spain is looking to the U.S., the biggest investor in Spain’s economy, to maintain confidence, his aide said.

Senior Executives

Zapatero was joined at the meeting by senior executives from Spanish bank BBVA SA, construction giants Acciona SA and Ferrovial SA, and Iberdrola SA, Spain’s biggest power company, according to the Spanish Embassy and Zapatero’s aides.

In his speech to the Atlantic Council, Zapatero said the Spanish financial system is “strong and solid,” and the country’s banks “have proven to be resilient.”

Spain has shown “its ability to grow and its ability to handle its public resources well,” the prime minister said.

“We know the reforms we need to make and I am certain Spanish society will be with us,” he added.

Zapatero recently announced tax increases and a rise in the retirement age as part of the package to cut Spain’s deficit.

Zapatero in his speech also underscored Spain’s commitment to the NATO-led security effort to stabilize Afghanistan, noting that his country had “heeded the call” of President Barack Obama and would be adding 500 new Spanish soldiers. Spain has lost 90 soldiers in Afghanistan, the fourth-largest number of casualties among the NATO nations.

“It’s a very difficult mission,” he said, adding, “we know what’s at stake in Afghanistan.”

Source

01/31/2010 (9:17 am)

Budweiser Clydesdales might be headed to the Super Bowl as A-B changes its mind

Filed under: technology |

ST. LOUIS — The Budweiser Clydesdales might be headed back to the Super Bowl after all.

Just two days after trumpeting a lineup of nine Super Bowl ads that did not include the popular horses, Anheuser-Busch said Thursday it has reconsidered. The brewer plans to release a Clydesdales ad and two other Budweiser ads on its Facebook page today to gauge public reaction.

The original Clydesdales spot — which fell short in focus group testing — has been reworked and might make it to the big game, according to A-B’s top marketing executive.

"This was a surprise opportunity that wasn’t in our hands until yesterday," Keith Levy, A-B marketing vice president, said Thursday evening.

Levy downplayed the notion that the change of heart was motivated by widespread criticism of A-B’s original decision to bench the Clydesdales, which have appeared in Budweiser ads for at least the last eight consecutive Super Bowls.

"We simply did not have a spot in our hands that did well" in testing, Levy said, although he noted A-B did "have some contact" from upset consumers that could have spurred A-B to revisit the ad.

Levy also said this was not part of an intentional publicity plan. Super Bowl advertising expert John Antil believed him.

"I think this is more about them just saving face," said Antil, a University of Delaware marketing professor. "I don’t think this is some kind of test."

Sidelining the Clydesdales drew plenty of criticism. Readers called and complained to the Post-Dispatch and on message boards. Twitter was burning. "Say it ain’t so! They’re the reason I watch!" wrote one woman. "What are they thinking?" lamented another. And: "Boo Hiss! Everybody loves the Clydesdales!"

The Clydesdales debuted in Budweiser TV ads in 1956 and have appeared in 15 Super Bowl ads. A-B bought five minutes of the pricey, precious ad time — an estimated $2.5 million for a 30-second spot— for the Feb. 7 football game, the year’s biggest advertising spectacle that is expected to be watched by at least 100 million people.

Levy said three ads would be released sometime before noon today at facebook.com/budweiser, the brand’s page on the social networking site. If the brewer selects the Clydesdales spot for the Super Bowl, it could result in a total reworking of A-B’s ad lineup because the new horse spot is 60 seconds long and would be replacing a 30-second spot.

The ad, created by Chicago ad agency DDB, opens with two baby horses — one is a Clydesdale — separated by a fence and running through a field. The ad follows the horses as they grow up together. It is a story about friendship and lifelong bonds, Levy said.

Kind of like those between some consumers and the Clydesdales.

Source

01/03/2010 (7:04 pm)

China-Asean Trade Pact Takes Hold, Spares Popcorn, Toilet Paper

Filed under: online |

A free-trade agreement between China and Southeast Asia comes into force today, consolidating a sixfold surge in economic activity over the past decade between countries representing a quarter of the world’s population.

The agreement expands a limited 2005 trade area between China and the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations, scrapping tariffs on about 90 percent of goods. By 2015, duties must be cut to no more than 50 percent on “highly sensitive” items, including ambulances in Brunei, popcorn in Indonesia, snowboard boots in Thailand and toilet paper in China.

China’s economic clout in Southeast Asian countries has risen over the past decade as policy makers slashed tariffs on electronics, automobile parts and computer chips. Japan, India, Europe and the U.S. have followed China in courting Asean, home to investments from Intel Corp., the world’s largest maker of computer chips, and Toyota Motor Corp., the biggest carmaker.

“This FTA is going to make a difference at the margin to some Asean countries but not others,” said Razeen Sally, a director of the Brussels-based European Centre for International Political Economy, a trade-policy research group. “Basically it takes down the tariffs but does little on all the non-tariff barriers where you would have much bigger gains to trade.”

China’s trade with Asean has jumped sixfold since 2000 to $193 billion last year, surpassing that of the U.S. China’s share of Southeast Asia’s total commerce has increased to 11.3 percent from 4 percent in that time, whereas the U.S.’s portion of trade with the bloc fell to 10.6 percent from 15 percent, Asean statistics show.

Deficit Widens

During that time, Asean’s trade deficit with China widened by five times to $21.6 billion. The bloc reported a $21.2 billion trade surplus with the U.S. last year, down 12 percent from 2000.

The trade agreement would hit high-tariff industries in Indonesia and the Philippines more than other Asean countries, Sally said. Trade in parts and components, the “central artery” of China-Asean economic ties, won’t be affected much because most of those tariffs are already near zero, he said.

Opposition to the trade agreement has been loudest in Indonesia, where the government has sought to placate concerns that industries including textiles, food and electronics will suffer. Indonesia should renegotiate the deal because the textile industry may see its domestic market share decline by 50 percent as cheaper Chinese goods enter the market, said Ade Sudradjat, vice chairman of the Indonesian Textile Association.

The government is setting up a team to monitor trade practices, Hatta Rajasa, coordinating minister for the economy, told reporters in Jakarta Dec. 30.

“When a nation has cheap products, we must see whether there’s unfair trade in it, such as unfair subsidies,” he said. “We must be proactive.”

Port Inspection

Indonesia, Asean’s biggest economy and home to about 40 percent of the bloc’s 584 million people, has required Chinese exports of garments, electronics, shoes, toys and food to be shipped from designated ports with every container inspected upon arrival. China, poised to overtake Germany as the world’s largest exporter this year, faces 101 trade investigations in 19 countries, state-run Xinhua News Agency reported this month.

Asean governments should resist the temptation to raise non-tariff barriers, the association’s secretary general, Surin Pitsuwan, told Xinhua in an interview published today.

To help its exporters, China has halted the yuan’s gains against the dollar from July last year. In 2009 the yuan has remained largely unchanged against the dollar while Indonesia’s rupiah climbed 15.5 percent, Thailand’s baht advanced 4.2 percent and the Philippine peso increased 2.3 percent.

Asean includes Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei, the Philippines, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam. Wide economic disparity has hindered the group’s efforts to form a single market, as the purchasing power of the group’s four richest countries was 10 times greater than that of the other members last year, according to statistics on the bloc’s Web site.

Source

12/20/2009 (2:09 pm)

Bakers doesn’t meet Nasdaq requirement

Filed under: marketing |

Bakers Footwear Group Inc., a St. Louis-based women’s footwear retailer, announced Friday that it no longer meets the minimum stockholders’ equity requirement needed to remain listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market.

For the quarter ended Oct. 31, Bakers reported a shareholders’ deficit of $3.5 million. The retailer said it intends to submit to Nasdaq by Dec. 29 a plan explaining how it will turn the deficit into equity and reach the minimum requirement of $2 poor credit personal loans.5 million this quarter. If the plan isn’t accepted by Nasdaq or if the plan fails, the company faces delisting from the stock exchange.

Source

12/06/2009 (11:24 am)

CAW to ‘reaffiliate’ with the Ontario Federation of Labour

Filed under: finance |

The Canadian Auto Workers says it will reaffiliate with the Ontario Federation of Labour after an absence of more than a decade.

CAW president Ken Lewenza said Friday that the union is currently talking to OFL leaders about conditions for a return that will likely come in the first quarter of next year.

"We’re not reaffiliating just to reaffiliate," Lewenza told more than 800 delegates at a CAW council meeting earlier. "We’re affiliating because we believe the labour movement needs us and we need the labour movement."

Union delegates had passed a resolution at a council meeting earlier this year to start a "constructive and respectful" dialogue that could lead to possible reaffiliation.

The CAW, one of the province’s biggest private sector unions, left the federation in 1997 after it could not get assurances of representation among the OFL’s top four officers payday loan online.

It has about 225,000 workers across the country including a majority in Ontario.

Lewenza said the labour movement in the province needs a united front in the growing attack on workers by corporations and governments.

The umbrella federation represents about 700,000 workers in scores of unions.

The split between the federation and the CAW has weakened the labour movement during the last decade as the groups pursued different strategies and agendas with less collective power, according to some labour analysts.

Source

12/03/2009 (5:14 pm)

Bernanke Has Support of Majority on Banking Panel

Filed under: legal |

Ben S. Bernanke has the backing of a majority of U.S. senators on the Banking Committee for a second term as Federal Reserve chairman.

Eight Democrats and four Republicans, among the 23 lawmakers on the panel overseeing the central bank, made their views known in interviews, comments to reporters or written statements. Some said they will support Bernanke, while others said they’re leaning in his favor.

Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, said yesterday that Bernanke has “done a pretty good job,” and that anger in Congress over the Fed’s role in the financial crisis is “misplaced.” Judd Gregg, a New Hampshire Republican, said Nov. 20 he will “absolutely” vote for Bernanke.

Criticism of the central bank has mounted in Congress since President Barack Obama nominated Bernanke in August, with many lawmakers blaming the Fed for lax supervision of banks and for taking part in taxpayer-funded bailouts of companies including Citigroup Inc. Some senators said those concerns won’t stop them from backing the former Princeton University economist.

“He’s been far from perfect,” Senator Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat, said in an interview yesterday. “He was not quick enough responding last year to many of these issues that we care about, particularly in housing. I want him to focus on jobs. But I think he’s generally done a decent job.”

Hearing Tomorrow

The banking panel holds a hearing on Bernanke’s nomination tomorrow in Washington. A vote hasn’t been scheduled, and the full Senate would then need to confirm the Fed chief. Bernanke’s four-year term ends Jan. 31.

Traders on Intrade, an online futures exchange, give Bernanke a 90 percent chance of Senate confirmation, up from 89 percent yesterday.

The Fed under Bernanke has slashed interest rates almost to zero and pumped more than $1 trillion into the financial system to battle the deepest recession since the 1930s. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index has jumped 64 percent from its 2009 low on March 9 as the economy showed signs of revival.

Policy makers last month repeated their pledge to keep rates low for an “extended period” to bring down an unemployment rate at a 26-year high. A government report Dec. 4 is likely to show that companies reduced payrolls for a 23rd straight month, according to a Bloomberg survey of economists.

Dodd said in August that while he’s had “serious differences” with the Fed, reappointing Bernanke is “probably the right choice.”

‘Pins and Needles’

Asked yesterday about his vote, Dodd told reporters, “I want you to be on pins and needles and wait until Thursday to hear this exciting news.”

Jim Bunning, the Kentucky Republican who was the only senator to oppose Bernanke’s first nomination in 2005, hasn’t changed his views.

“His job rating would be zero minus F,” Bunning said in an interview yesterday. “He has catered to the big banks, to the Wall Street elitists, to every major money concern in the country and in the world.”

Senator Bernard Sanders, a Vermont independent who isn’t on the banking committee, said today that he placed a procedural hold on Bernanke’s nomination, which requires 60 votes to break. “Mr. Bernanke has failed,” Sanders said in an e-mailed statement. “It’s time for him to go.”

The other Democrats on the banking panel expressing support for Bernanke include South Dakota’s Tim Johnson, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, New York’s Charles Schumer, Evan Bayh of Indiana, Hawaii’s Daniel Akaka and Virginia’s Mark Warner.

Three said they’re undecided, including Wisconsin’s Herb Kohl, Jon Tester of Montana and Jeff Merkley of Oregon.

‘Earth Shattering’

Among Republicans, Nebraska’s Mike Johanns said Bernanke “will have my support.” Utah’s Robert Bennett said he’ll probably vote in favor, while Bob Corker of Tennessee said he is likely to back Bernanke “if nothing earth-shattering comes out of the hearings and the follow-ups.”

Alabama Senator Richard Shelby, the panel’s top Republican, declined to comment except to say, “You’ll be there Thursday.”

Bernanke, 55, has presided over the most expansive use of Fed powers since the 1930s, taking control of insurer American International Group Inc. and launching unprecedented programs to contain fallout from a run on money-market funds and to buy short-term debt from companies such as General Electric Co.

Some lawmakers have accused the Fed of overstepping its authority and failing to properly supervise the financial firms that packaged and sold the mortgage-backed securities at the heart of the crisis.

‘Abysmal Failure’

Dodd, calling the Fed’s record on banking supervision an “abysmal failure,” introduced legislation in November that would strip the central bank of that role. Also last month, the House Financial Services Committee approved a proposal to remove a three-decade ban on congressional audits of Fed interest-rate decisions.

The Fed chief said in a Nov. 29 commentary in the Washington Post that curbing the central bank’s authority to supervise the banking system and tampering with its independence would “seriously impair” economic stability in the U.S.

Frederic Mishkin, a former Fed governor who now teaches at Columbia University in New York, called the measure that would allow audits of Fed policy “incredibly dangerous.”

“If you make the central bank beholden to politicians on a short-run basis, you get very bad outcomes: high inflation and less of the ability to deal with shocks like the ones we had recently,” Mishkin said yesterday in an interview.

Source

11/28/2009 (7:45 pm)

Bank ‘problem’ list climbs to 552

Filed under: economics |

Despite the frenetic pace of bank failures this year, 552 lenders are still at risk of going under, according to a government report published Tuesday.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said that the number of banks on its so-called problem list climbed to its highest level since the end of 1993. At that time, the agency red-flagged 575 banks.

Mounting bank failures have proven costly for the FDIC, the government agency created to cover the deposits of consumers and businesses in the event that a bank is shut down.

On Tuesday, the agency revealed its deposit insurance fund, as a result, slipped into the red for the first time since 1991.

At the end of the quarter on Sept. 30, the value of the fund was $8.2 billion in the hole. But that number accounts for $21.7 billion the agency has set aside in anticipation of future bank failures.

FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair, who has won praise both in Washington and on Main Street for shepherding the industry through a particularly difficult period, said the industry’s fate is tied to the broader recovery.

"I think that it really is all about the economy at this point," said Bair.

The banks that end up on the problem list are considered the most likely to fail because of difficulties with their finances, operations or management.

Still, history has shown just 13% of banks on the list have failed on average.

Regulators however, never make public the names of the banks on the list out of fear the publicity could cause customers to pull out their deposits.

Tuesday’s report did reveal that the number of assets controlled by those institutions climbed to $345.9 billion from $299.8 billion in the previous quarter.

The ongoing recession has already claimed 124 banks so far this year. But fears persist that the number will multiply in months ahead because banks are still taking losses on mortgage-related loans and face growing problems with commercial real estate.

In the event of a failure, the FDIC fully insures individual accounts up to $250,000 for single accounts.

Fund in focus

In anticipation of future bank failures, the FDIC has been scrambling to shore up its ailing deposit insurance fund low fee payday loans.

Earlier this year, the agency imposed a special assessment on all banks. And just recently, it approved having banks prepay their insurance premiums for the next three years.

The move is expected to generate roughly $45 billion for the FDIC. However, due to accounting rules, the fund would not be back in the black until 2012.

One lingering question is whether, at some point, the agency would need to tap its $500 billion credit line with the Treasury Department, which was approved earlier this year.

The agency however, has been averse to the idea, hoping instead it can instead navigate the crisis using the tools already at its disposal.

Mixed signals

Tuesday’s report however, wasn’t all bad news.

The roughly 8,100 institutions that make up the nation’s banking industry earned $2.8 billion during the third quarter. In the previous quarter, banks were in the red, losing a combined $4.3 billion.

Stronger sales and the rising values of some securities certainly helped, but those gains were capped as lenders again set aside massive amount of cash to cope with future loan losses. All told, banks earmarked $62.5 billion for future loan losses.

While that was down slightly from the previous quarter, Bair cautioned not to read too much into the numbers, adding that number could jump back up in the current quarter.

"I think we need to live with this a bit longer," she said. "I wouldn’t read too much in quarter-to-quarter trends."

One persistent trend, however, was that credit continued to remain tight. In fact, loan balances at the nation’s lenders fell 2.8% of $210.4 billion, representing the largest quarterly decline since banks started reporting this figure in 1984.

Some economists have argued that the lack of available credit to borrowers, such as small business owners, is choking off the economic recovery. Banks, on the other hand, have argued that demand for loans is way off, as both consumers and businesses try to pay down debt. 

Source

11/26/2009 (1:18 am)

Liberty Bancorp completes tender offer toward going private

Filed under: economics |

Liberty Bancorp Inc. announced the results of a tender offer for common stock held by investors with 99 or fewer shares, part of its effort to get below the 300 shareholder limit, which would enable it to go private.

The Liberty-based company (Nasdaq: LBCP), the holding company for BankLiberty, said in a Tuesday release that it had acquired 4,631 shares for $15 a share, for a total of $69,465. The company also offered a $50 bonus for all trades executed before the deadline, but it did not say how many shareholders were involved in the trades.

The company didn’t say whether it reached the goal of reducing the number of shareholders to fewer than 300.

Liberty Bancorp CEO Brent Giles couldn’t immediately be reached for comment Wednesday cash advance loans.

Giles had said in October that the bank’s board determined that Securities and Exchange Commission regulations and legislation, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which the bank will be subject to starting in 2010, were getting too burdensome on the company’s financial and personnel resources.

“We hope that by reducing the number of shareholders and, if eligible, deregistering with the SEC, the company will substantially reduce the costs associated with complying with these regulations and reporting requirements,” Giles said in an earlier release.

Source

Next Page »